CADTH
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advanced Search
  • Sitemap
  • Extranet
  • Help
  •  
  • Français
  • About
    CADTH
    • Corporate Profile
    • CADTH Products
    • Therapeutic Review
    • Contact Us
    • Terms of Use
  • Knowledge
    Exchange
    • Knowledge Transfer
    • Liaison Program
    • Partnerships and Strategic Initiatives
  • Health Technology
    Assessment
    • HTA News
    • HTA Reports and Publications
    • Programs
    • HTA Projects
    • HTA Events
    • Advisory Committees
    • FAQ
    • Suggest a Topic
    • Contact Us
  • Common Drug
    Review
    • CDR Overview
    • CDR Process
    • Advisory Committees
    • Recommendations and Status of Drug Submissions
    • Search CDR Drug Database
    • CDR Update
    • Filing a Submission
    • CDR Links
    • CDR News
    • Events
    • Contact Us
  • Canadian Optimal Medication
    Prescribing & Utilization Service
    • Search Our Publications and Tools
    • Insulin Analogue Therapy
    • Blood Glucose Test Strips
    • Second-line therapy for patients with diabetes
    • Rx for Change Database
    • Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
    • Optimal Therapy Resources
    • COMPUS Communiqué
    • About COMPUS
    • Advisory Committees
    • COMPUS Process
    • Contact Us
  • Policy
    Forum
    • Policy Options Documents
    • Policy Information Documents
    • Discussion Papers
    • HTIS reports commissioned by Policy Forum
    • Terms of Reference
    • Member Listing
    • Contacts
  • Media Centre
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Subscribe
  • Related Links
  • CADTH @ 20
This is the beginning of the side menu Internal link to skip the top and side navigation menus and go directly to the page content

Common Drug Review

  • CDR Overview
  • CDR Process
  • Advisory Committees
  • Recommendations and Status of Drug Submissions
  • Search CDR Drug Database
  • CDR Update
  • Filing a Submission
  • CDR Links
  • CDR News
  • Events
  • Contact Us
  • Common Drug Review
  • » CDR Process

CDR Process

Origins

The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health developed the Common Drug Review (CDR) process, in consultation with the drug plans that participate in the program, the pharmaceutical industry, and the public.

The process continues to evolve as a result of ongoing communications with these and other stakeholders.

For detailed information

The Procedure for Common Drug Review describes, in detail, the CDR process for reviewing drugs and providing formulary listing recommendations to the public drug benefit plans in Canada (except Québec).

Summaries of Process

The following points, or the Common Drug Review process flowchart, provide summaries of the process.

  • A drug manufacturer, a drug plan, or the Advisory Committee on Pharmaceuticals files a submission for a drug to the CDR.
  • A CDR review team is established for the drug submission.
    • Typically, review teams consist of clinical reviewers, pharmacoeconomic reviewers, a clinical specialist, an information specialist, the CDR Manager of Drug Reviews, a project advisor, and a project manager.
    • Reviewers must abide by the Conflict of Interest Guidelines for the Common Drug Review.
  • A systematic review of the clinical evidence, and a critique of the pharmacoeconomic data are prepared by the review team.
  • The reviews are based on the drug submission, plus information retrieved through independent literature searches, to ensure that all available evidence is considered.
  • Guidelines and templates are used in preparing the reviews to ensure a consistent, rigorous, and high quality approach.
  • CDR edits and assesses the reviews for quality.
  • Reviews are sent to the manufacturer for comment.
  • Reviewers prepare a reply to the manufacturer’s comments on the reviews.
  • A dossier is prepared for the Canadian Expert Drug Advisory Committee (CEDAC).
  • CEDAC meets to consider the submission.
    • Deliberations are based on the CEDAC dossier, and may also include input from other experts or the CDR review team.
  • The initial CEDAC formulary listing recommendation, and the reasons for the recommendation, are sent to the manufacturer and the drug plans in confidence.
  • During the embargo period, the drug plans may request clarification of the recommendation; and based on specified criteria, the manufacturer may request that CEDAC reconsider the drug.
    • If the drug plans request clarification, it is provided.
    • If the manufacturer requests and is granted a reconsideration, CEDAC reviews the submission at a subsequent meeting.
  • The final recommendation and reasons for the recommendation are sent to the manufacturer and drug plans, and are then released publicly.

Related Information

  • CDR Overview
  • Timeframes for CDR Procedure
  • CADTH’s business hours and holiday schedule
  • CDR Confidentiality Guidelines
  • CDR Clinical Review Report Template
  • CDR Pharmacoeconomic Review Report Template
Top of Page Privacy Policy Feedback Terms of use

© 2010 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health

Last Updated February 11, 2010