CADTH | Evidence Driven
CADTH | Evidence Driven

Recognition and Diagnosis of Sepsis in Rural or Remote Areas: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines

Details

Files
Project Status:
Completed
Project Line:
Reference List
Project Sub Line:
Reference List
Project Number:
RA0945-000

Question


  1. What is the clinical effectiveness of processes used for the assessment for and recognition of sepsis in adults with suspected sepsis in rural or remote areas?

  2. What is the clinical effectiveness of tests used for sepsis diagnosis in adults with suspected sepsis in rural or remote areas?

  3. What is the cost-effectiveness of tests used for sepsis diagnosis in adults with suspected sepsis in rural or remote areas?

  4. What are the evidence-based guidelines associated with the processes used for the assessment for and recognition of sepsis in adults with suspected sepsis in rural or remote areas?

  5. What are the evidence-based guidelines associated with tests used for sepsis diagnosis in adults with suspected sepsis in rural or remote areas?


Key Message

No literature was identified regarding the clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of processes for tests used for the assessment or recognition of sepsis in adults with suspected sepsis in rural or remote areas. In addition, no evidence-based guidelines were identified.


Files

Recognition and Diagnosis of Sepsis in Rural or Remote Areas: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines Rapid Response January 23, 2018 View PDF

Related Content

Last Updated : January 23, 2018