CADTH is committed to supporting Canada’s health care decision-makers through this challenging and uncertain time.
For evidence, tools, and resources related to COVID-19, visit our COVID-19 Evidence Portal.
Use of personal interviewing, group discussion (
One high quality (Baker) and one key review (Shaw) were identified. Findings from these reviews show tailored interventions to be generally effective for improving appropriate care and prescribing behaviours.
2 reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of tailored interventions were identified. Of these, 2/2 high quality/key reviews with a sufficient number of studies to draw conclusions found this intervention to be generally effective.
2/2 high quality/key reviews with a sufficient number of studies to draw conclusions found this intervention to be generally effective for improving prescribing outcomes.
Reviews listed as "Summary Pending" will be analyzed, summarized and reported at a later date.
The findings will then be incorporated in the overall evidence summaries of the interventions they address.
|Reviews Addressing This Intervention||Quality Assessment Tool:
AMSTAR Score (of 11 points)
|Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, Robertson N. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 3:CD005470.||9 (High)|
|Thomas RE, Russell ML, Lorenzetti DL. Systematic review of interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older. Vaccine 2010 28 (7):1684-701.||7 (Medium)|