Last Updated : January 4, 2022
Remote monitoring is a type of virtually delivered health care service that can serve as an adjunct to in-person care for patients with chronic cardiac conditions (e.g., heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension) or for patents undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. While it is not intended as a substitute for in-person care, it may facilitate an improved quality of care, decrease the need for inperson health care visits, reduce hospitalizations, and improve access for patients living in rural and remote areas. Especially given the significant increase in virtually delivered health care following the COVID-19 pandemic, remote monitoring programs are likely to be of high interest across Canadian jurisdictions.
At its core, remote monitoring relies on the use of telecommunication technology for the transmission of health data between patients and health care providers. Examples of health data that may be transmitted include readings of physiological activity such as oxygen saturation levels and cardiac rhythm or patient observations such as mental status and medication intake. For example, for patients with hypertension, blood pressure readings could be transmitted to evaluate treatment effectiveness and adherence. For the purposes of this Health Technology Assessment (HTA), CADTH considers a remote monitoring program to be a formal, organized offering from a health authority or health care organization that may employ a variety of technologies (e.g., video conferencing, blood pressure monitors, online portals) to collect and transmit patient data.
Given that remote monitoring programs are already being implemented in Canada (albeit in various stages of diffusion in different jurisdictions), a review of the factors that contribute to successful implementation will help to inform decision-makers’ strategies moving forward.
This HTA did not focus on the usual questions of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; rather, it focused on implementation considerations. The HTA included 3 sections: a realist review (which sought to identify key perceived or actual mechanisms of remote monitoring programs); a review of perspectives, experiences, and expectations (which thematically synthesized primary qualitative research in addition to engaging patients and caregivers directly); and an ethics review (which sought to identify and reflect upon key ethical issues regarding the implementation of remote monitoring programs). CADTH’s Health Technology Expert Review Panel (or HTERP) then developed recommendations based on the evidence presented in the HTA.
Based on the findings of CADTH’s Health Technology Assessment on remote monitoring programs for patients with chronic cardiac conditions, the CADTH Health Technology Expert Review Panel (or HTERP) recommended that the design and implementation of such programs include a broad range of stakeholder voices, with considerations across several key domains summarized here.